VERTICAL AI FOR WORK THAT MUST SURVIVE REVIEW · LEGAL · HEALTHCARE · ENERGY · ENGINEERING · FINANCE

Your AI can't explain itself. Ours shows the receipt.

Kaia is vertical AI for work that must survive review — pre-trained where it learns, deterministic where it counts, from the courtroom to the plant floor. Agents arrive with the evidence chain for every decision, and every correction your experts make compounds in your tenant, not ours.

Patent-pending regulated AI architecture · Kaia AI™ — trademark filed (USPTO serial 50060787)

The two problems

Regulated work runs on evidence. Most AI runs on vibes.

01 · The indefensible answer

The black box is a liability

When a regulator, auditor, or opposing counsel asks why the system decided, “the model said so” is not an answer. You need the receipt: what was proposed, on what evidence, under which policy, and who signed.

02 · The leaking asset

You pay for intelligence twice

Once in money — and again in the proprietary know-how your experts feed the vendor's model every time they correct it. That second payment never comes back to you. It should. It's yours.

Why Kaia

Agents that arrive knowing your vertical — and get measurably better with every correction your experts make.

Kaia agents arrive knowing your industry's work — pre-trained for invoice-to-resolution in accounts payable, privilege and responsiveness in legal review, and claims investigation; deterministic, audit-ready reserves disclosure in energy, where the math is the model. Your team starts from intelligence, not from a blank model.

Every correction is captured with its full provenance — what was proposed, who corrected it, why it was accepted, under which model, prompt, and policy — and that record stays your governed asset, inside your tenant.

Improvement is a release discipline, not a slogan. Corrections move accuracy on a frozen, versioned evaluation set, and the delta ships with the evidence to reproduce it. The model may be rented; the operating intelligence you create compounds for you.

See the release-over-release improvement curve and the five learning layers →

Correction receipt · illustrative

ProposedPrivileged — attorney work product
Confidence0.81 → routed to review
Corrected byReviewing attorney (bar-verified)
DispositionNot privileged — accepted, reason logged
Learning routeLayer 2 · knowledge update · tenant-scoped
Eval impact+0.4 pt on frozen eval set v3
PromotionEvaluated → approved → released, rollback armed

The four launch products

One engine. Four regulated operations, end to end.

The depth proof

Legal

Role-native legal operations: classification, privilege review, entity extraction, production export — with the correction and handoff continuity a court-defensible record requires.

95.7% privilege-detection accuracy — measured internally on 810 held-out documentsmeasured (internal) · 0.90 regulated confidence floor

See what you get →

The wedge · start here

Accounts Payable

Governed invoice-to-resolution: intake, matching, exception handling, approval, audit. Segregation of duties and delegation-of-authority bands enforced in the workflow, not the policy PDF.

92.75% exact extraction accuracy — measured internally on 1,200 held-out invoicesmeasured (internal) · measured on a published gold set, reported release over release

See what you get →

The fast follow

Claims

Claims decisions, investigation, evidence assembly, and role handoffs — with the qualified-human sign-off regulators now require by statute, enforced as a floor the engine cannot waive.

99.66% fraud-signal recall at 100% precision — measured internally on the held-out setmeasured (internal)

See what you get →

The lighthouse

Oil & Gas

Governed evidence and decision workflows for technically and regulatorily complex operations — SEC reserves disclosure stood up spec-to-production on the hardened platform template.

Deterministic reserves math + RAG, qualified-technical-person sign-off

See what you get →

Why you can believe it

Our marketing plays by our trust page's rules.

Most vendors put badges here. We put the inventory. The same fail-closed control register we serve to client compliance teams — a control with no live enforcement shows as an open gap, never a checkmark.

Including our own gaps. The encrypted-tier cutover is disclosed as not-yet-done. No independent attestation is held yet, and we say so in the same breath as the controls that are operating. Diligence us — you'll find nothing we didn't tell you first.

Benchmarks behave the same way. What is measured says measured — with its evaluation, scope, and date. What is a target says target — with the gold-set mechanism that will measure it, published as measured from launch.

Control posture · rendered from live enforcement
Tenant isolation — database-enforced (RLS)operating
Append-only audit trail — DB-trigger immutableoperating
Regulated-decision human floorsoperating
Correction records write-onceoperating
Encryption at rest — serving instance (KMS)operating · since Aug 2026
Independent SOC 2 attestationnot held · in progress

Bring one painful workflow. We'll bring the receipt.

Controlled-availability design partnerships: one bounded process, one governed deployment, one measured outcome — and the corrections your experts make compound for you from day one.

Request a discovery call